Highlights of concerns about development in Leitrim Wetlands

Published on
Share This

Threats to Greenspaces

Information from Dr. Gabriel Blouin-Demers, biologist, on Blanding's Turtle at Leitrim
BACKGROUNDER Information from Dr. Gabriel Blouin-Demers, biologist, on...
Dr. Clarke Topp: Biography
Dr. G. Clarke Topp Soil Physicist Education: B.S.A. (1959) Univ. of Guelph;...
Draining Leitrim Wetland: Findings of Dr. G. Clarke Topp, soil physicist
BACKGROUNDER Findings of Dr. G. Clarke Topp, soil physicist Dr. Clarke...
Saving Leitrim Wetland
Introduction and Background Located in the southern part of the City of...
Letter to Anne McLellan, P.C., M.P.
The Honourable Anne McLellan, P.C., M.P. Minister of Health House of Commons Parliament...

– The proposed development will adversely affect the Leitrim Wetlands and have a significantly negative effect on Findlay Creek and the local water table.

– The area to be re-zoned for development includes a major part of an identified Urban Natural Area, the loss of which would result in significant decline in wildlife, especially birds, and would be contrary to Ottawa’s Official Plan objective to increase forest cover.

– There are 10 Regionally Significant plant species in the area to be re-zoned, and at least 35 Uncommon native plants. The City of Ottawa should be protecting these species, not allowing them to be destroyed.

– The proposed development will mean the loss of a natural transition zone between the center of the wetland and the surrounding area. Transition zones are areas of the greatest biodiversity.

– There are uncertainties about the effect on human health of toxic wastes migrating from the former Gloucester Landfill.

– Various federal government approvals for this development were based on commitments to maintain water levels and plant communities in the center of the wetland in their pre-construction state. These commitments are not being met. In spite of this, the City of Ottawa, federal and provincial authorities are for the most part not responding effectively to the violations.

– A large swale has been constructed that was not shown on any of the plans, including the 2004 Community Design Plan and the draft Plan of Subdivision sent to Ottawa City Council in the Spring of 2006. Yet this swale appeared on a design drawing dated February 2005 and was subsequently referred to in an Amended Certificate of Approval issued by the Ontario Ministry of Environment in January 2006. The issuance of the amended approval certificate was inappropriate and, furthermore, the swale could pose safety risks to children and may negatively affect the wetland.