Category: OTHER

April 21, 2009 The long-awaited “Third Party Review” by Greenland International Consulting Ltd. was released on April 9, 2009. It is available on the City web site and consists of two large pdf files, 126 pages in all. Comments to staff were due by 9 a.m. on April 20. Here are some comments that were sent in. They are addressed to Carol Christensen, Manager – Environmental Sustainability at the City.

On January 18, 2010, as a private citizen, City of Ottawa water resources engineer Darlene Conway wrote to the Ontario Minister of the Environment and various MOE and other Provincial officials to document her concerns about the so-called “model of record” that is being employed in the ongoing infrastructure planning for development in and around Kanata West. That model is one outcome of the Third Party Review that was a response

There was a follow-up story by Patrick Dare in The Ottawa Citizen of February 8 [earlier web version no longer online; it had two informative sentences that were deleted in the print version]. It reports that Ted Cooper wrote to the Ministry of Natural Resources last fall, requesting an investigation into a possible conflict of interest involving a Ministry official who reviewed and advised on consulting engineering work done for

For years, Ted Cooper has put his job on the line trying to stop the City of Ottawa from permitting buildings on flood-prone land along the Carp River. Finally, the city listened. Patrick Dare in The Ottawa Citizen of Tuesday, February 05, 2008: The City of Ottawa is promising a full, independent investigation after it was discovered that the planning study for the proposed huge development of Kanata West didn’t

August 29, 2010 Fourteen months after City Council accepted the Third Party Review (TPR) report, staff posted Notices of Completion for the amended Kanata West / Carp River environmental assessments. By the August 29, 2010 deadline, several Part II Order Requests had been filed: + Six individuals jointly sent in an 8-page letter. Signatories, also speaking for Friends of the Carp River, Ottawa Riverkeeper and Sierra Club Canada, included all

Minister issues Order under s. 16 (3) of the EAA On July 21, 2008, just over two years after receiving “Part II Order Requests“, Ontario’s Minister of the Environment responded with an Order to the City regarding all further development in the Kanata West area. In addition to the arguments put forward by the Part II Order Requesters, the 6-page letter [467 KB] refers to the City’s own request of

Planning and Environment Committee deliberated on the proposed Terms of Reference for a Third Party Review of Carp River-related projects on June 24. Please look here for a report on this meeting, including all related documents. At Council the following day, the amended recommendations were endorsed. One key change from what staff proposed is that the Reviewer will consult with the Auditor General and those who have filed a Part

Draft Terms of Reference for Third Party Review – Carp River  (May 29, 2008) Comments to staff on the Terms of Reference – Carp Open Letter to City Council on the Terms of Reference – Carp Terms of Reference at Planning Committee & Council, June 24-25

On May 12, apparently in response to questions raised, John Price, Watershed Management Coordinator at the Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority, sent a memo to the City “to review the policy basis for application of a floodway/flood fringe as part of the Carp River Restoration Plan and how some other Conservation Authorities have chosen to address similar situations”. In response, Darlene Conway, water resources engineer at the City, as a private

Coalition demande l’arrêt du développement de Kanata Ouest La Coalition de la Rivière Carp réclame un arrêt de tout développement dans Kanata Ouest jusqu’à ce que toutes les études de soutien soient corrigées et approuvées. Un rapport présenté par le Vérificateur général d’Ottawa, Alain Lalonde, lors de la réunion du Conseil municipal d’Ottawa le 23 avril 2008 soulève des inquiétudes concernant l’exactitude et la validité des études relatives au développement