Tag: Municipal Election

Policies & Threats Related to Greenspaces

Your search result for:

WARD 11 Candidates – Beacon Hill-Cyrville

The propositions: 1. Support for a strong site alteration by-law, with emphasis on “strong.” 2. Renewed commitment to an annual allocation towards an environmental lands acquisition fund. 3. Standing firm in support of the prohibition against future country lot subdivisions. 4. The City’s Advisory Committees should be genuine bridges between the public and Council. Michel Tardif: “I agree with all 4 and if elected, I expect to hear again from.”

Read More »

WARD 10 Candidates – Gloucester-Southgate

The propositions: 1. Support for a strong site alteration by-law, with emphasis on “strong.” 2. Renewed commitment to an annual allocation towards an environmental lands acquisition fund. 3. Standing firm in support of the prohibition against future country lot subdivisions. 4. The City’s Advisory Committees should be genuine bridges between the public and Council. Diane Deans: “Unfortunately, due to the sheer volume of requests, and given the time constraints during

Read More »

WARD 9 Candidates – Knoxdale-Merivale

The propositions: 1. Support for a strong site alteration by-law, with emphasis on “strong.” 2. Renewed commitment to an annual allocation towards an environmental lands acquisition fund. 3. Standing firm in support of the prohibition against future country lot subdivisions. 4. The City’s Advisory Committees should be genuine bridges between the public and Council. Keith Egli : #1: “…this matter needs to be followed up on.” #2: “…I support the

Read More »

WARD 8 Candidates – College

The propositions: 1. Support for a strong site alteration by-law, with emphasis on “strong.” 2. Renewed commitment to an annual allocation towards an environmental lands acquisition fund. 3. Standing firm in support of the prohibition against future country lot subdivisions. 4. The City’s Advisory Committees should be genuine bridges between the public and Council. Craig MacAulay: “I enthusiastically support all four Greenspace Alliance propositions. Keep up the great work!” Guy

Read More »

WARD 7 Candidates – Bay

The propositions: 1. Support for a strong site alteration by-law, with emphasis on “strong.” 2. Renewed commitment to an annual allocation towards an environmental lands acquisition fund. 3. Standing firm in support of the prohibition against future country lot subdivisions. 4. The City’s Advisory Committees should be genuine bridges between the public and Council. Alex Cullen: #1: “I was a member of the City’s Planning Committee for many years, and

Read More »

Ward 6 Candidates – Stittsville

The propositions: 1. Support for a strong site alteration by-law, with emphasis on “strong.” 2. Renewed commitment to an annual allocation towards an environmental lands acquisition fund. 3. Standing firm in support of the prohibition against future country lot subdivisions. 4. The City’s Advisory Committees should be genuine bridges between the public and Council. Neither of the two candidates responded by the deadline. However, David Lee replied later. His responses

Read More »

WARD 5 Candidates – West Carleton-March

The propositions: 1. Support for a strong site alteration by-law, with emphasis on “strong.” 2. Renewed commitment to an annual allocation towards an environmental lands acquisition fund. 3. Standing firm in support of the prohibition against future country lot subdivisions. 4. The City’s Advisory Committees should be genuine bridges between the public and Council. Brendan Gorman: “In terms of your specific questions I am not sure. I’d have to look

Read More »

Ward 4 Candidates – Kanata North

The propositions: 1. Support for a strong site alteration by-law, with emphasis on “strong.” 2. Renewed commitment to an annual allocation towards an environmental lands acquisition fund. 3. Standing firm in support of the prohibition against future country lot subdivisions. 4. The City’s Advisory Committees should be genuine bridges between the public and Council. Marianne Wilkinson: #1: “Re removal of topsoil, grade alteration and placement of fill – I support

Read More »

WARD 2 Candidates – Innes

The propositions: 1. Support for a strong site alteration by-law, with emphasis on “strong.” 2. Renewed commitment to an annual allocation towards an environmental lands acquisition fund. 3. Standing firm in support of the prohibition against future country lot subdivisions. 4. The City’s Advisory Committees should be genuine bridges between the public and Council. None of the candidates responded.

Read More »

WARD 3 Candidates – Barrhaven

The propositions: 1. Support for a strong site alteration by-law, with emphasis on “strong.” 2. Renewed commitment to an annual allocation towards an environmental lands acquisition fund. 3. Standing firm in support of the prohibition against future country lot subdivisions. 4. The City’s Advisory Committees should be genuine bridges between the public and Council. One candidate was not accessible. The other two candidates did not respond.

Read More »